Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Recent Pat Anticancer Drug Discov ; 19(3): 396-401, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38214323

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: As the second most prevalent hematologic malignancy, multiple myeloma (MM) affects plasma cells and is characterized by chromosomal abnormalities, particularly involving the immunoglobulin heavy chain switch region. MM represents a biologically and clinically heterogeneous hematological malignancy that serves as a clonal evolution model, exhibiting clonal heterogeneity throughout all stages from monoclonal gammopathy undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) to MM. Although significant progress has been made in the treatment of MM, leading to improved patient outcomes, concerns are arising regarding disease relapse due to the presence and selection of pre-existing resistant clones or selective pressure during therapy. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of multiple myeloma (MM) in a female patient, who underwent an 8-year course of treatment, including chemotherapy, immunomodulators, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, CD38 monoclonal antibody, and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T), and was recently diagnosed with concurrent progressive MM and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). This patient has witnessed the evolution of MM treatment paradigms. CONCLUSION: In this course, disease relapses occurred twice, one of which was manifested by a light chain escape (LCE). Moreover, through the course of the disease in this patient, we review the process of clonal evolution that may be relevant.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Hematológicas , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Gamopatia Monoclonal de Significância Indeterminada , Mieloma Múltiplo , Paraproteinemias , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mieloma Múltiplo/tratamento farmacológico , Paraproteinemias/patologia , Gamopatia Monoclonal de Significância Indeterminada/diagnóstico , Gamopatia Monoclonal de Significância Indeterminada/patologia , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Imunoterapia
2.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37937574

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Splenic marginal zone Lymphoma (SMZL) is a rare, chronic B lymphocyte proliferative disease. Generally, SMZL is accompanied by circulating atypical villous lymphocytes, known as SMZL with villous lymphocytes. Rituximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody to CD20; recent but limited studies have confirmed its effectiveness in treating SMZL. Given the low incidence and selection of treatment, statistical comparisons of rituximab monotherapy with other available treatment options with the full range of data from previous clinical studies remain sparse. Here, we report a case of SMZL with villous lymphocytes treated by rituximab monotherapy, which is especially infrequently reported. CASE REPORT: A 63-year-old Chinese female was presented to the hospital with complaints of splenomegaly and pain in the spleen area. Immunohistochemistry analysis was positive for IGH, IGK, and IGL clonal rearrangement. Villous lymphocytes were found in peripheral blood and bone marrow, along with further immunotyping results. The case was considered as SMZL with villous lymphocytes. Based on the SMZLSG prognosis assessment, we applied rituximab monotherapy. After eight cycles of rituximab treatment, the patient's condition improved markedly, with blood constituent and size of the spleen returning to normal levels, achieving complete response, with no significant side effect observed. DISCUSSION: The patient provides a typical SMZL with villous lymphocytes case treated with rituximab monotherapy. Currently, the main treatment options include splenectomy and rituximab. After synthesizing a series of current views, we put forward our opinion about the selection of therapy for SMZL patients in order to gain maximum benefits for patients in need of treatment. CONCLUSION: Our analysis found no statistically significant difference between rituximab monotherapy and rituximab combined with chemotherapy, while rituximab treatments resulted in better therapeutic effects than chemotherapy. Rituximab monotherapy has favorable therapeutic effects and minor adverse effects (AEs) in treating SMZL.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...